BIJDZ5071 BIJDZ5071
  • 10-09-2017
  • Social Studies
contestada

One who acts in-a manner that is very annoying, but not threatening, may be liable for the infliction of emotional distress.

Respuesta :

SeoJoon15
SeoJoon15 SeoJoon15
  • 21-09-2017
The answer is no, the person who acts in a manner that is very annoying but not threatening can't be liable for the infliction of emotional distress because in order to inflict emotional distress, the person should be threatening and not just plainly annoying towards others.
Answer Link

Otras preguntas

Delusions of grandeur is the false belief that __________. a. one is being manipulated b. emphasizes self-importance c. emphasizes self-manipulation d. one is b
Which sentence is the clearest example of alliteration?
What is the energy of a single photon of visible light with a wavelength of 500.0 nm? 1 nm=10^−9 m 1. 3.97×10^−19 J 2. 84×10^14 J 2. 02×10^18 J 4. 95×10^−19 J
What was the result of the Kent State Massacre? A. It led to new laws protecting the environment. B. It led to increased civil rights for Black citizens. C.
what are the "trifles" that the men ignore, and the two women notice?
Which product is the result of mitosis? two genetically identical nuclei four sperm and four eggs four genetically identical nuclei two sperm and two eggs
What did the South Georgia often import in exchange for cotton
answer all 3 for brainliest
20. A centimeter is 1/100t of a meter, while a kilo- meter is equal to 1000 meters? a. True b. False
what is the probability of tossing a coin three times and getting tails each time?